Apple Announces Disappointing iPad
- 10 Comment

Today, at a special event, Apple showed off its newest creation to the world. It’s called the iPad and it’s a huge disappointment. Perhaps we set ourselves up to be disappointed because there were so many rumors about how glorious the device would be, so anything that Apple came up with would fall short of our expectations.
I think the iPad will be a failure for Apple. The main problem I see for it is that there is no market for such a device. There is nothing that the iPad can do that cannot be done by a laptop, iPhone, or iPod Touch. There is no incentive for customers to spend, at a minimum, $499 on this device.
Another problem is the storage on the iPad. It comes in 16, 32, and 64 GB sizes, priced at $499, $599, and $699, respectively. That is really not a lot of storage space, especially for music, movies, games, and other entertainment-related content.
Speaking of different versions of the iPad, it also comes in a version that has 3G connectivity. Considering that the device is meant to be portable, the 3G iPad is the better one to get. However, users will have to pay for an AT&T plan to take advantage of 3G. The plan is priced at $15 a month for 250 MB of data, or $29.99 for unlimited. For users who want to stream movies, the unlimited plan is probably the one to choose, raising the price even more.
The iPad can run larger versions of iPhone apps. In fact, Apple is going to introduce a new version of iWork for the iPad. Each part of iWork will be sold separately, costing $10 per app. There still will be no multitasking for apps—only one can be running at a time (except for apps made by Apple).
Finally, the iPad is an e-reader as well. Apple is offering a new system called iBooks which will offer content from major book publishers. This is one of the few redeeming features of the device.
Another shortcoming on the iPad is the fact that it does not support Adobe Flash, just like the iPhone and iPod Touch. When will Apple learn that we really want Flash support on our mobile devices?
I admit to being a bit surprised at Apple. Usually Apple products are better than this. The design and the name are even uninspired, to say nothing of the features. The iPad is an excellent idea that unfortunately was not realized to its full potential.
Via CNET, image via Apple.


[...] latest product, the iPad, was announced on Wednesday and it already has loads of people talking. I personally was disappointed by it, but some analysts are saying that it is just the sort of thing that the tablet market [...]
[...] of my initial complaints about Apple’s upcoming iPad was its lack of Adobe Flash support (the iPhone is the same way [...]
[...] has been negative. Many commentators have rushed to depict it as a solution looking for a problem, disappointing in comparison to the wild rumors before it’s release, and not something for serious computer [...]
[...] recent unveiling of the iPad was more than a simple product announcement intended to make consumers want to buy Apple products. [...]
[...] recent unveiling of the iPad was more than a simple product announcement intended to [...]
[...] there does not seem to have been a very positive reaction to Apple’s iPad. A poll conducted by retailer Retrevo has shown that fewer people want the [...]
[...] Even the cheapest iPad—the 16 GB model—may be too expensive for many consumers. It is priced at $499. But thanks to the low cost of iPad components compared to the price of the device, Apple does have room to lower the retail price if it needs to. [...]
[...] with the highly anticipated iPad release from Apple at the end of March, comes a heated debate regarding whether the iPad should run [...]
[...] I know I was so against the iPad when Apple first announced it. I said that it was extremely disappointing and that I did not want [...]
[...] know, I know: I called the iPad “disappointing” when Apple first announced it on January 27 of this year. Since then, I have changed my [...]